Ab Initio: Questioning of Four Government Officials Started

Ab Initio: Questioning of Four Government Officials Started

Authorities are questioning several government officials in the Ab Initio investigation. The president once again claims that the cases are politically motivated and downplays the most recent developments.

Four Officials Questioned by Authorities

Three months after losing their legal protection, four political figures in Madeira - the following defendants were questioned by the judicial police as part of the Ab Initio investigation.

After the questioning, Pedro Fino said he had a clear conscience but did not comment on the case, as it is under judicial secrecy. He expressed confidence that the situation would be clarified in time.

Why Does Someone Become an "Arguido"?

A person is given the status of a defendant when:

  • They are suspected of involvement in a crime.

  • There is enough evidence to justify further investigation.

  • Authorities want to question them in an official way, ensuring they have legal rights (e.g., the right to remain silent and to have a lawyer).

Ab Initio

Investigation Focuses on Suspected Financial Crimes

The Ab Initio investigation, which started in September last year, investigates possible economic misconduct in business dealings, misuse of public office, and illegal political party financing. At the time, eight people were arrested but later released.

The Public Prosecutor's Office has to carry out its investigation. Everyone knows that these matters have political implications. The new strategy now is to use legal complaints as political tools instead of presenting real alternatives

Miquel Albuquerque, RTP Madeira

Miguel Albuquerque Downplays Development and Supports PSD Officials

In response to the questioning, Miguel Albuquerque, President of the Regional Government of Madeira, reaffirmed his trust in those involved. The president, who is himself a defendant facing numerous accusations but enjoys political immunity, emphasized that their legal status does not imply guilt, describing it as a procedural right rather than an accusation. Albuquerque suggested that political motives might influence the case, arguing that legal complaints are used as political tools instead of presenting real alternatives.

Political and Legal Consequences

The case has gained attention due to its political impact. While Albuquerque insists that the government remains stable, the opposition has raised obvious concerns about transparency in public administration. The Public Prosecutor's Office continues its investigation, and it is unclear whether formal charges will be filed.

Comments